EVE Search - Planned lowsec sentry "fix"

Issler Dainze wrote:

Minmatar Citizen160812 wrote:

Issler Dainze wrote:

Poetic Stanziel wrote:

Issler Dainze wrote:

Well, depends on the care bear. For example if they can get into low sec they can consider trade at stations, explore the belts, search for anomolies or even consider missions that require low sec. Don't get me wrong, this alone is not the "get the bear into low sec fix" but reducing gate camps will have to part of the solution once other carrots are put into low sec to make risk/reward make sense in this under utilized portion of space.

And to be fair I should have reworded my post. What I was really reacting to was that this issue is not "clear support against and none for", there was support for variations of the idea with players as well as those against. Not acknowledging that some folks liked the idea in general (including a few CSM) was what prompted me to post.

I don't think gate gun changes are as dead as some may have suggested. Also, the real discussion should be broader about how to improve low sec for everyone.

Issler

You are clueless.

Gate camps are not prolific. I hop into and out of lowsec many many many times per week and rarely encounter gate camps.

Rancer and Amamake are not indicative of all lowsec/highsec border systems. If you think that, then you're a damned fool.

You might want to start travelling into lowsec, Issler, before spouting off your nonsense.

I live in low sec so I definitely know what I'm talking about. Last night there was a camp on at least one of the gates ot the three systems I was running trade through for about 90% of the two hours I was on.

Our corp used to operate in a high sec bubble in the middle of low sec and because the major routes in and out were constantly camped we moved almost all our activity out.

Maybe you need to spend more time in low sec.

Issler

Wait a minute....you live in low sec, got enough people to vote for you to win a trip to Iceland and you can't bust a gate camp....

You DON'T know what you're talking about. Who cares about the 2 hours you had to play. In that time if you can't avoid or destroy a static camp with a batphone alone you should be impeached as a representative of EVE players. If you're talking about Titans bombing gates then you really don't know what you're talking about because that only happens in a couple places which are easy to avoid.

Good luck on the next contest to win a vacation with these quotes floating around....friggen clueless trader looking to be can clouded and inty ganked....what a maroon.

I regularly run the camps and the folks that voted me in largely agree with me on this. The folks that disagree aren't the ones I expect any support from. So this wouldn't have any affect if I was inclined to run again. Also, I'm not a CSM that goes to Iceland and if you ask the ones that do it is not a vacation.

Issler